The
recent withdrawal of a giant Chinese oil rig from Vietnamese waters was
welcomed with anxiety in Hanoi
as many analysts have interpreted the departure as little more than tactical
feint in a territorial battle that is sure to drag on.
On July 15, the state-owned China
National Petroleum Corporation announced that the US$1-billion oil rig had
finished drilling near the Paracel (Hoang Sa) Islands, which the country
seized by force in 1974.
The rig will be relocated closer to Hainan Island, China's southernmost province,
after having successfully discovered “signs of oil and gas,” the Chinese
company said in a statement last week.
The rig set of a kind of
geopolitical storm when it arrived in Vietnam’s
200-nautical-mile exclusive economic zone and continental shelf in the East Sea,
internationally known as the South China Sea,
on May 2.
In the ensuing days, China built up an aggressive fleet around the
rig to chase off Vietnamese police boats, triggering peaceful protests that
erupted into violence in central and southern Vietnam two weeks later. The
resulting riots left hundreds of foreign-owned factories vandalized and three
Chinese nationals dead.
The rig was originally scheduled to
explore the waters around the Paracels until mid-August and independent
analysts have tried to account for why China
withdrew it ahead of schedule; China’s Xinhua news agency noted
that July was the beginning of the typhoon season.
Analysts say the move may have been
prompted by the simple completion of its mission objective: to find enough
hydrocarbons to justify coming back at a later time. The early arrival of two
major typhoons allowed China
the perfect face-saving opportunity to exit.
Others argue that Beijing
hopes to defuse tensions and repair their bilateral relationship with Vietnam, noting how much China stands
to gain from the current uncertainty.
“The prospects of discussions will
constrain Vietnam from taking legal action against China, and it will also
constrain Vietnam from seeking to align with the US and Japan,” Carl Thayer,
a maritime expert at the University of New South Wales in Australia, told
Thanh Nien News.
Vietnamese Prime Minister Nguyen Tan
Dung has said his government will consider taking legal action against China to
resolve the dispute. In March, the Philippines
submitted a case to an arbitration tribunal in The Hague,
challenging China's claims
in the East Sea.
On July 10, the divided and partisan
US Senate unanimously passed a resolution which, among other things, urged China to withdraw its oil rig from Vietnamese
waters--a move welcomed by both Vietnam
and the Philippines.
China has
bristled at the US's
strategic “pivot” towards the region, blaming it for aggravating an already
tense situation. Japan, America’s treaty ally which remains embroiled
in its own dispute with China
over ownership of islands in the East China Sea, recently ramped up economic
and strategic engagement with Hanoi.
By removing the oil rig ahead of
schedule, China may have
proven that it can act with impunity--sowing seeds of doubt in the region
about America's
reliability as an ally, analysts say.
“China
was also posing two questions to Vietnam:
even as you move closer to the US,
do you really think that Washington
is going to help you defend your claims? Surely it is better to negotiate a
solution directly with us?” said Ian Storey, a senior fellow at the Institute of Southeast
Asian Studies in Singapore.
Brewing tensions
Beijing routinely
outlines the scope of its territorial claims by referring to maps featuring a
nine-dashed line--a demarcation that takes in about 90 percent of the 3.5
million square kilometer East
Sea.
Chinese maps featuring the line have
been emphatically rejected by international geographers. Moreover, the maps
fly in the face of competing claims by four members of the Association of
Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) --namely Vietnam,
the Philippines, Malaysia and Brunei.
In late June, Beijing
unveiled a new official map that portrayed these contested islets, shoals and
waters as integral parts of China’s
territorial limits. In recent weeks, China dispatched three more oil rigs
across the East Sea, while ramping up a number of land reclamation projects
on small islands in the Spratly Islands (also part of the East Sea), where it
plans to build airstrips and other long-term facilities.
The removal of the oil rig from
Vietnamese waters occurred a day after US President Barack Obama called his
Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping to talk about what the White House called the
“important progress” at recent meetings between the two countries in Beijing.
The telephone call took place less
than a week after the Senate passed its resolution, which has been disdained
by several analysts as a toothless but destabilizing wrench thrown into an
already tense situation.
China was also
posing two questions to Vietnam:
even as you move closer to the US,
do you really think that Washington
is going to help you defend your claims? Surely it is better to negotiate a
solution directly with us?” -- Ian Storey, a senior fellow at the
Institute of Southeast Asian Studies in Singapore
Analysts say that given the Chinese
policymaking process, it would be surprising that a single event (either the
presidential telephone call or the Senate resolution) could change China’s
policy course.
“It may have been an influence, but
a small one,” said Zachary Abuza, a Washington-based Asia
analyst. “I think the Chinese know that it is a resolution only from a
Congress that tends to be very anti-Chinese in general. They assume that the
Obama administration has no stomach for escalating the conflict with Beijing,” he said.
Although the crisis appears over for
the moment and PM Nguyen Tan Dung has demanded that China not send any more rigs into
Vietnamese waters, most expect the oil rigs will be back, either later this
year or next year, prompting another round of tensions between Hanoi and Beijing.
“In the meantime, Vietnam’s leaders will have to re-examine
their policy towards their giant northern neighbor and how best to deal with
a stronger, more confident and more assertive China,” Storey said.
By An Dien, Thanh Nien News
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét