Vietnam mulls taxing multiple-house owners
An aerial view of a
residential area in District 7, Ho Chi Minh City.
Vietnam’s Ministry of Finance
is weighing up a policy that requires those who own more than one house to
pay extra tax, a plan to which local experts have mostly responded
positively.
The ministry has tasked its tax policy department with
developing the plan, deputy minister Huynh Quang Hai confirmed to Tuoi Tre (Youth)
newspaper on Sunday.
Hai admitted that it is unlikely that the new tax policy will
be issued before next year, but “it must be enacted in the future,” given the
current tight state budget and the fact that “other countries have been
collecting this kind of tax for years.”
The finance ministry began considering taxing multiple-home
owners as early as 2009, with three possible tax plans on the table then.
The first plan was to levy fixed taxes on the second and any
subsequent homes. Buildings under two stories would be exempted, while those
with three stories and above would be subject to a tax of VND2,000 per square
meter per year, according to the tentative tax plan.
The second plan considered a 0.03 percent tax on the value of
the second and any subsequent homes after deducting VND1 billion ($44,643).
For example, if the house is valued at VND1.2 billion ($53,571), the owner
would pay a 0.03 percent tax on a VND200 million ($8,929) value per year.
The final proposal sought to tax the extra area of the house,
after deducting 200 square meters, with the tax ranging from VND2,000 to
VND4,000 a square meter per year. This meant that if the house measured 300
square meters, the ‘taxable area’ is 100 square meters.
The plan failed to meet with approval from the lawmaking
National Assembly, with lawmakers saying it was not the right time to impose
housing taxes and that taxes collected would not contribute significantly to
the state coffers.
However, seven years on, the finance ministry and several
experts now believe it is high time the plan was reconsidered.
Social equality?
In an interview with Tuoi Tre on Sunday, Professor Dang Hung Vo,
former deputy minister of natural resources, said that Vietnam is lagging way
behind other countries in imposing property tax.
Vo said homeowners must pay taxes, and that tax rates must be
progressively increased on the second and any subsequent homes.
“Some houses are built on very large land plots so the owners
should pay taxes that ensure social equality,” he underlined.
Prof. Vo explained that the current social inequality meant
that the state only collects a modest amount of land use tax from homeowners,
which is insufficient to cover expenses that maintain working public
amenities.
Vietnam sets a land use tax of 0.03-0.07 percent based on the
government-stipulated property prices, while other countries impose taxes of
1 to 1.5 percent on the property's market price, according to the professor.
“The government’s prices are always much lower than market
prices,” he said.
“For instance, I have a 150 square meter house in Hanoi but
only have to pay VND1 million [$45] in land use tax per year, which is
unreasonably low.”
Assoc. Prof. Nguyen Dinh Chien, from the tax department of the
Academy of Finance, backed the idea that people who own multiple homes pay
taxes that ensure social equality.
“Multi-home owners only live in one of their many houses, and
the remaining are up for rent,” Chien said, implying that their rental
incomes are to be taxed.
Dr. Do Thi Thin, another tax expert, said people who own
multiple houses are high-income earners so “regulating their income via tax”
will create fairness.
Other industry insiders said the multiple-home tax will
prevent property speculation.
“As they do not have to pay any taxes for the ‘extra’
properties, and the land use taxes are modest, many people are willing to
‘stockpile’ homes in the hope of deriving profit,” one financial expert said.
Property speculation sometimes sends house prices skyrocketing,
making them unaffordable for buyers with shallow pockets.
TUOI TRE NEWS
|
Thứ Hai, 31 tháng 10, 2016
Đăng ký:
Đăng Nhận xét (Atom)
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét