The world says “no" to chemical
weapons
After nuclear weapons, chemical weapons are one of the
most destructive weapons, causing mass destruction because chemicals
(sometimes called military poisons) in this type of weapon have a common
character - highly toxic, fast-acting to cause major losses to the enemy or
direct hazard for many people, animals and plants in general.
There are many kinds of chemical weapons, classified in
two ways. The first is in the way of harmful effects for humans and plants,
such as asphyxiation chemical weapons, chemical weapons causing nerve damage,
chemical weapons causing skin ulcers and chemical weapons destroying plants.
The second is based on the subjects: chemical weapons destroying vitality and
chemical weapons destroying plants.
Owing to the great harm to humans and the environment,
most countries in the world agree to add chemical weapons in the list of
weapons of mass destruction, including nuclear weapons, chemical weapons and
biological weapons.
These kinds of weapons are on the specifically
prohibited list. For chemical weapons, the most important international legal
document is the Chemical Weapons Convention, including the prohibition of
development, prohibition of production, ban of store and use and provisions
for the destruction of chemical weapons.
This convention is managed by the Organization for the
Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, an independent organization based in Hague,
the
As of June 2013, 189 countries are members of the
Chemical Weapons Convention. Two countries -
Thus, most countries in the world have committed to
"say no" to chemical weapons. However, between the "saying
no" or signing the convention and the thorough implementation of it may
have "exception" circumstances.
Also, in December 1980,
The chemical industry in
In limited extent,
Obviously, as with nuclear weapons,
"Vietnam does not own nuclear, biological or
chemical weapons or programs to develop such weapons, and is a party to most
of the non-proliferation treaties and the related agreements, etc. ...,"
confirmed the Nuclear Threat Initiative (NIT), an internationally renowned
non-governmental organization.
Vietnamese AO victims.
The war that the
Mr. Nguyen Van Rinh, chairman of the Vietnam
Association for Victims of Agent Orange/dioxin (VAVA) stated: On November 20,
1961, the U.S. Government officially approved for the U.S. Army to conduct a
defoliation campaign. After test flights, on August 10, 1961 U.S. military
aircrafts began a campaign to spray defoliant in South Vietnam, along Road 14
from northern Kon Tum to Dak To.
During the 10 years, from 1961 to 1971, the
Specifically, 4.8 million people in
According to the definition of chemicals in weapons,
the Agent Orange that was used by the U.S. military during the Vietnam War is
a kind of "military chemical" or chemical weapon. But the U.S. is
still trying to shirk responsibility, reject petitions against the companies
that manufactured and supplied chemicals to the U.S. military during the war,
with the plaintiff as Vietnamese victims, whose representative is the Vietnam
Association for Victims of Agent Orange/dioxin.
The
It is absurd when in fact the
The story must come to an end
The U.S. Army military used chemicals or chemical
weapons 40, 50 years ago but the compensation for tens of thousands of
families, millions of victims have not been resolved.
One of the barriers set by the
But quite unexpectedly, a result recently published by
a research team, not in Vietnam but in the United States, has attracted
special attention of the public: Agent Orange/dioxin used by the U.S. in the
Vietnam War not only caused consequences for Vietnamese but also for the
American veterans.
According to Reuters, the research work was conducted
by Dr. Mark Garzotto and colleagues at the
The researchers analyzed the medical records of 2,720
veterans who did a prostate biopsy. Each 1/13 of them were exposure to Agent
Orange during the Vietnam War. About 900 people or 33 percent of the veterans
were diagnosed with prostate cancer, of which approximately half of them
caused aggressive and fast-growing prostate cancer.
After considering age, race, weight, and history of
cancer in families of veterans, the group concluded that those who were
exposure to Agent Orange are at higher risk of catching prostate cancer by 52
percent higher than those who are not exposed to Agent Orange.
Many newspapers and media outlets in the
With the results of this new study, the chairman of the
Vietnam Association for Victims of Agent Orange/dioxin said: "We are
preparing legal basis to prepare a new lawsuit. This is completely a civil
action by the victims who live near the hotspots and have daily exposure to
the air, water, and food that are affected with AO."
Unlike the previous cases, in which the plaintiffs are
the people who are directly affected by Agent Orange/dioxin, in the upcoming
lawsuit, the victims are the second and the third generation victims,
including women and children living in hot spots around the airports of
The unraveling of the concepts, language, legal citing,
etc. is also necessary and may need more time. But the responsibility to
identify, implement liable for thousands of families, millions of people in
Vietnam, as well as tens of thousands of American soldiers who have been
dying, suffering pains should not be further delayed.
It is not only the call of humanity, the decorum of a
nation, but also the call of justice and truth in the present era of
civilization.
Tran Minh
|
Thứ Tư, 26 tháng 6, 2013
Đăng ký:
Đăng Nhận xét (Atom)
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét