|
|
Captain Ivan Cadeau (R) talked about the Catroux
Commission's documents classified as top secret by the French government
|
Cadeau said after the fall of France in the
battle, General Navarre felt hurt, incorrectly judged and mistreated. He was
denied a promotion promised by the French government prior to the military
operation. In late 1954, Navarre lodged an appeal to the minister in
charge of war affairs, demanding a body comprising military officers be set
up to inquire about the accountability of those involving in the operation.
“Navarre wanted to make clear that the root cause of
the defeat lied in decisions made by politicians and that politicians should
be held responsible for the defeat,” captain Cadeau said.
“However, the government of Prime Minister Mendes France refused the request, reasoning France wanted
to forget the saga.”
For its legal and political ramifications, Navarre ’s
proposal was hotly debated among senior military officers, and was finally
turned down. General Navarre did not give up his hope.
In January 1955 a series of controversial arguments
erupted when General Réné Cogny, one of Navarre ’s
close aides, wrote several newspaper articles, attributing the failure of the
French military operation in Dien Bien directly to deficient decisions made
by Navarre .
Cogny’s statement immediately provoked Navarre ’s anger, and in a series of interviews
published in the daily French newspaper Le
Figaro , Navarre
said he would uncover the naked truth. His strong determination prompted the
French government to take action.
On January 22, 1955, PM Mendes France received General Navarre, and they both
agreed that Navarre
would cease publishing articles in Le Figaro in return for the
establishment of an independent inquiry.
On February 5, 1955 the French News Agency AFP reported
the establishment of the Catroux Commission on March 31, 1955 to look into
the cause of the French defeat in the Dien Bien Phu
battle.
Classified documents
General Georges Catroux, who presided over the
Commission, and other members were senior military officers in the French
military. They were permitted to access the Defence Ministry’s classified
documents and question key leaders of the Dien Bien Phu
battle.
Classified as top secret, the French government did not
disclose the commission’s conclusions until 2005.
|
Tapes recording the detailed inquiries of French
generals
|
The commission concluded that in context with the power
of the Viet Minh (Vietnamese military) growing substantially and supported by
China , other French
generals could not have performed any better than what General Navarre or
Cogny did in Dien Bien Phu .
“After inquiries, there was high consensus in the
military that key figures in the inquiries could not be considered the main
culprits of the French failure in Indochina .
The defeat was the result of a series of wrong decisions, from political to
military,” said captain Cadeau.
However, the results of the inquiries were not
disclosed to the public, as politicians wanted to elude the responsibility
and a number of military agencies did not want the truth revealed. They
reasoned France was still
confronted with other wars in North Africa .
In late 1955 General Navarre requested a copy of the
conclusions but his request was summarily dismissed, and the inquiries were
kept as top secret.
In its conclusions, the Catroux Commission noted that
it was a strategic disadvantage for the French Military to conduct a large
scale battle in Dien Bien Phu which was about 400km from the coast, 300km
from French air bases, and near China ’s border.
It was France ’s
wrong decision that General Navarre might not have encountered if he had
sufficiently more time to evaluate the logistic potential of Viet Minh, as
well as other characteristics of the battlefield.
Obviously the commission was playing down the defeat of
the French military in Dien Bien Phu by
describing it as an “inevitable failure” and they did not dwell with any
seriousness on mistakes by the French administration and military.
Conflicts unveiled
Many French veterans said they had little knowledge
about the Catroux Commission. Colonel Jacques Allaire, who was then a
lieutenant in Dien Bien Phu , said the
commission later revealed in part a big conflict between General Navarre and
General Cogny.
“When the operation began, French soldiers did not know
anything about the feud between these two Generals. Only after I was released
by Viet Minh, did I hear about the presence of the Catroux Commission and the
two Generals’ disagreement,” said Allaires.
“I read several documents of the commission and found
that the commission seemed to reprimand Cogny more severely than Navarre .”
“But I think both Generals made mistakes. If Navarre trusted Cogny blindly, he would keep
an eye open on Cogny’s operations in Dien Bien Phu .”
With the 50-year passing of the Catroux Commission’s
conclusions, it seems as if the government, military and people of France wanted questions regarding the cause of
their bitter defeat of the 1954 Dien Bien Phu
battle to fall into oblivion.
Yet, the search was resuscitated and the quest for
truth given new life when classified documents were made public in 2005.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét