Saigon Sunbay: Super-project sits stagnant
Despite
construction starting in late 2007, Saigon Sunbay, Vietnam’s largest seaside
eco-town project to date in Ho Chi Minh City’s Can Gio district, has seen
poor progress, resulting in suspicions and concerns from residents on the
project site.
After seven years, the only completed features of the
project are a wall surrounding the site built by former contract Dai Phu
Gia-Anjeong consortium and a stone jetty lining 100 hectares of beach by
local and current contractor Lung Lo-Sao Mai consortium.
According to people who live on the contract site, work
halted immediately after completing the stone jetty right after Lunar New
Year this year.
At the time, Lung Lo-Sao Mai had machines and
construction crews on the site and work was in full gear, but since the
holiday, no progress has been seen.
In early April, VIR contacted Can Tho Tourist City
Corporation (CTC) and spoke with a company representative who confirmed that
construction has now been halted for several months.
“We are making preparations for changes to the
implementation plan,” he said, adding that the project would soon begin anew.
As per the initial design, Saigon Sunbay would cover
600ha including 200ha of beach and would cost a staggering $1.5 billion. The
capital needed for site clearance and infrastructure development alone was
estimated at $350 million.
Notably, the developer had also committed to creating a
land fund by encroaching the sea and using the reclaimed land for site
clearance.
Saigon Sunbay was divided into four zones: HeartBay
(high-end resorts and hotels, diverse commercial, tourist and entertainment
activities); LifeBay (high-end residential areas); EcoBay (floating resorts,
green park, bungalow, spa, etc.) and BlueBay (beach and marina).
One of the main obstacles to the project’s progress was
capital, the developer explained, saying that the project was based on the Ho Chi Minh City
economic development forecast for 2007-2008.
Accordingly, the city was forecast to continue robust
growth during that period, paving the way for developers to work on big
projects and initiate plans to raise capital from partners. What happened
instead was the financial and housing crisis and the developer was unable to
source capital.
Asked by VIR on the current status of raising capital
for the project, the company declined to respond about specifics, but said
reports have been sent to city authorities and agencies, and steps were being
taken to move forward.
One marked change at the project was the selection of
new contractor, aforementioned Lung Lo-Sao Mai consortium, which is highly
regarded and has a wealth of experience in hydraulic engineering and
construction.
In late March VIR sent a dispatch to the Ho Chi Minh
City Department of Planning and Investment requesting an up-to-date and
transparent report on the project’s progress but an official response remains
forthcoming.
Senior economist Nguyen The Hien, commenting on the
case, said it was important for the developer to set progress targets.
Otherwise city authorities would likely revoke the project’s licence or
downsize its scale to devote more land to public tourism development, giving
locals a better chance to involve in pushing forward tourism in the area.
By Hong Son, VIR
|
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét