China a harasser crying, 'Stop harassing!' A China Coast Guard ship is seen near the Chinese drilling rig Haiyang Shiyou 981, which has been illegally planted in Vietnam's waters since May 1, 2014.Tuoi Tre Editor’s Note: Local writer Tran Van sent Tuoitrenews an article, expressing his opposition to wrongful statements recently made by the Ambassador of the People’s Republic of China to the Kingdom of Thailand amid tension between Vietnam and China over the Haiyang Shiyou 981 oil rig Beijing has unlawfully positioned in Vietnamese waters in the East Vietnam Sea since May 1. In a piece published in the Matichon newspaper on June 23, 2014, Ning Fuikui, Ambassador of the People’s Republic of China to the Kingdom of Thailand rightly pointed out that the world has recently shown their deep disappointment with China’s wrongful acts such as drilling in the exclusive economic zone and continental shelf of another country and deliberately colliding with, ramming, and sinking the latter’s vessels while they were operating normally in Vietnamese waters. These acts not only disregard international law, violate the Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the East Vietnam Sea (DOC), go against bilateral agreements reached by the two countries’ senior leaders, but also aggravate the situation in the East Vietnam Sea and increase the tension in the region. However, to find excuses for the actions of China, Ambassador Ning did not hesitate to re-write history, fabricate facts and use twisted arguments in order to hide the truth. So what truth was Ambassador Ning trying to cover up? Paracels belong to Vietnam Vietnam has sufficient historical and legal foundations to assert its sovereignty over the Paracel (Hoang Sa in Vietnamese) and Spratly (Truong Sa) Archipelagos. Vietnam was the very first nation to occupy and then continuously and peacefully exercise sovereign rights over the two archipelagos. Since at least the 17th century, when these territories were still terra nullius ("land belonging to no one"), the Nguyen Lords of Vietnam (1558-1783) had established the Paracel naval fleet to administrate and exploit the archipelago. This fleet was sent every year to the archipelago to exploit resources, undertake geographical and geological measurements, conduct salvage operations, construct landmarks and other utility buildings, etc. China, for its part, expressed no intention to claim sovereignty over the Paracel Archipelago. In 1898, after ships Bellona and Himeji Maru had sunk in the Paracels and were looted by Chinese fishermen, the Deputy Governor of Guangdong stated that the Paracel Archipelago was terra nullius which did not belong to China and was not administratively attached to any district of Hainan and that no authority was responsible for policing it. On the other hand, many Chinese documents, such as Haiwai jishi (Records of Things Overseas), published in 1696 or Hailu (Records at Sea), released in 1820 acknowledge that this archipelago belongs to Vietnam. The Cairo Conference in 1943 and Potsdam Conference in 1945 of which China was a participant declared that the islands in the Pacific that Japan had taken by force during World War 2 had to be returned and the territories that Japan had to return to China were Manju, Taiwan and Penghu only, not including the Paracel and Spratly Archipelagos. No official document was written, as Ambassador Ning claimed, that in 1946, China recovered the Paracels from Japan. In particular, at the San Francisco Conference in 1951, the request that Japan recognize the sovereignty of China over the Paracel Archipelago was rejected by conference attendees with 46 votes against. At this conference, Head of the Vietnamese Delegation, Prime Minister Tran Van Huu affirmed the sovereignty of Vietnam over the Paracels and Spratlys, which met with no protest from all the 51 participating countries. In fact, in 1956 and 1974, China took by force the eastern half and then the western half of the Paracel Archipelago from the Republic of Vietnam. This act violated the prohibition of use of force against the territorial integrity of another state, a peremptory norm of international law. This aggression, along with other wrongful acts of China from the very beginning, has met with strong protests from Vietnam. The fact that Ambassador Ning cited a number of documents from the Democratic Republic of Vietnam before 1974 to argue that Vietnam recognized the sovereignty of China over this archipelago is a twisted argument. According to the Geneva Accords of 1954, the Democratic Republic of Vietnam was assigned to administrate the northern half of Vietnam from the 17th parallel, which did not include the Paracel Archipelago. China must be well aware of this matter. China is infringing upon Vietnam’s sovereign rights and jurisdiction Although Ambassador Ning had misled public opinion on the question of sovereignty, he failed to suppress another truth. That is, by all means, the oil rig is located within Vietnam’s exclusive economic zone and continental shelf. I would like to invite Ambassador Ning to read the basic documents of the law of the sea to see that both the so-called “17-nautical-mile-water” of Triton Island and the “baseline of the Paracel Archipelago” claimed by China are against the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, 1982. Therefore, China has violated the former’s sovereign rights and jurisdiction by unilaterally drilling in an area located about 60-80 nautical miles deep inside Vietnam’s exclusive economic zone and continental shelf. Vietnam has consistently and vehemently protested against all encroachments on its waters. As Ambassador Ning rightly pointed out, China has, on a number of occasions, intruded into this area to conduct surveys. In response to such intrusions, Vietnam has dispatched law enforcement vessels to the area to give warnings and to chase away the Chinese vessels conducting illegal activities therein and has, at the same time, sent Notes Verbales to China to protest. All are still on the record. Ambassador Ning also felt free to make accusations without evidence. While stating that Vietnam has sent “frogmen” to this area and Vietnamese ships have rammed Chinese vessels a total of 1,416 times, Ambassador Ning and the government of China could not provide any proof to support these wrongful statements. Quite the opposite, video clips provided by Vietnam and reports from international journalists on the scene have told a completely different story. It is China who has used a large number of vessels of different types, including military ships with ready-to-deploy weapons (at times reaching up to 140 ones), to escort the oil rig. Chinese ships have deliberately rammed and fired water cannons at Vietnamese vessels, causing injuries to dozens of officers, damaging many vessels of Vietnam’s civilian law enforcement agencies, and even going as far as sinking a Vietnamese fishing boat. It is ridiculous that Ambassador Ning cited “large numbers of obstacles, including fishing nets and floating objects” in the waters to accuse Vietnam of harassment. They were nothing but pieces breaking away from Vietnamese ships after being violently hit by Chinese vessels which are another set of evidences of the brutality of the Chinese watercrafts. All the evidences of China’s violent and aggressive behaviours are publicly available for anyone who wants to check them out. Thai friends could also ask news agencies having offices in Thailand who have sent reporters to the scene to have more information. Fuelled by anger towards the above-mentioned behaviours of China, Vietnamese people had spontaneous protest demonstrations in some provinces to express their patriotism. Some people made use of the Vietnamese people’s patriotism to do some provocative and illegal acts, which caused unfortunate adverse effects on a few of Chinese workers and foreign investors in Vietnam. The Vietnamese government immediately took resolute measures such as arresting the offenders, reinforcing security and compensating affected enterprises. To date, the situation has been stabilized and the affected enterprises have resumed their usual production. All the efforts of the Vietnamese government have received praise from foreign investors. However, Ambassador Ning has unfailingly put the blame on the Vietnamese government and deliberately fabricated the fact. Instead of rushing into blaming the Vietnamese government, Ambassador Ning should have asked himself what the Chinese government had done for Japanese investors who were also affected by the anti-Japan riots in China two years ago. China ignores Vietnam’s goodwill    Since the beginning of the operation of Hayang Shiyou 981, Vietnam has made utmost efforts to communicate and conduct dialogue with China to demand that Beijing immediately stop all violations of Vietnam’s sovereign rights and jurisdiction, and substantially negotiate to resolve the issues at sea between the two countries. Vietnam has conducted more than 30 diplomatic communications with relevant Chinese authorities. The latest was the invitation of State Councillor of China Yang Jiechi to Hanoi by Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister of Vietnam Pham Binh Minh to discuss this issue. But China has, up to date, consistently refused to withdraw the oil rig and to start faithful negotiations to stabilize the situation. Agreeing to the idiom about keeping promises quoted by Ambassador Ning, I strongly urge the Chinese government to honour the promise made by Deng Xiaoping, the then Deputy Prime Minister of China to Le Duan, First Secretary of the Communist Party of Vietnam in 1975 to resolve the disagreement between the two countries over the Paracels through friendly negotiation, as well as to honour all other relevant bilateral agreements. Vietnam actively respects international law Vietnam has proven to be a strong supporter of international law, peace, stability and development in the Gulf of Thailand and the East Vietnam Sea via its concrete deeds. In 1997, Vietnam and Thailand successfully signed a maritime boundary delimitation agreement over the Gulf of Thailand, the first such a pact in Southeast Asia after the entry into force of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and the first maritime boundary agreement in the Gulf of Thailand. Vietnamese and Thai governments also undertook concrete cooperative activities in the insurance of maritime security and protection of marine living resources in this area as well as carried out join patrols. Besides, Vietnam has successfully signed maritime boundary delimitation agreements with many other countries in the Gulf of Thailand and the East Vietnam Sea including with China in the Gulf of Tonkin in 2000, which was the first maritime boundary agreement ever signed by China. Vietnam has also been undertaking many important bilateral and multilateral cooperative initiatives in the East Vietnam Sea in different sectors such as marine scientific research, management and conservation of natural resources, exploration and exploitation of mineral resources (such as the negotiations between Vietnam, Thailand and Malaysia for joint development in the Gulf of Thailand). In particular, just before the unilateral drilling of China, Vietnam and China agreed to set up a group to discuss joint development at sea.   Continuing this policy of supporting international law, peace, stability and development in the region, Vietnam will resolutely use all peaceful means allowed by international law to protect its legitimate rights and interests. Vietnam hopes that governments and people from all around the world, including the government and people of Thailand, will continue to support the people of Vietnam in these goodwill efforts. Since Ambassador Ning seems to have a particular sense for quotations, I would like to end this note by quoting an ancient Chinese proverb: “Look inside you before blaming others.” Ambassador Ning should look at China’s own behaviors to see why the country has been criticized by public opinion instead of groundlessly blaming others for that. Tran Van, Tuoitre