Senate Blocks Drive for Gun Control
President Obama hugged the mother of a Newtown victim.
By JONATHAN
WEISMAN
WASHINGTON
- A wrenching national search for solutions to the violence that left 20
children dead in Newtown, Conn., all but ended Wednesday after the Senate
defeated several measures to expand gun control.
In rapid succession, a bipartisan compromise to expand
background checks for gun buyers, a ban on assault weapons and a ban on
high-capacity gun magazines all failed to get the 60 votes needed under an
agreement between both parties. Senators also turned back Republican
proposals to expand permission to carry concealed weapons and to focus law
enforcement efforts on prosecuting gun crimes.
Sitting in the Senate gallery
with other survivors of recent mass shootings and their family members, Lori
Haas, whose daughter was shot at Virginia Tech, and Patricia Maisch, a
survivor of the mass shooting in Arizona,
shouted together, “Shame on you.”
President Obama, speaking at
the White House after the votes, echoed the cry, calling Wednesday “a pretty
shameful day for Washington.”
Opponents of gun control from
both parties said that they made their decisions based on logic, and that
passions had no place in the making of momentous policy.
“Criminals do not submit to
background checks now,” said Senator Charles E. Grassley, Republican of Iowa.
“They will not submit to expanded background checks.”
It was a striking defeat for
one of Mr. Obama’s highest priorities, on an issue that has consumed much of
the country since Adam Lanza opened fire with an assault weapon in the halls
of Sandy Hook Elementary School in December.
Faced with a decision either
to remove substantial new gun restrictions from the bill or to allow it to
fall to a filibuster next week, Senate leaders plan to put it
on hold after a scattering of votes Thursday. Senator Harry Reid
of Nevada, the majority leader and a longtime gun rights advocate who had
thrown himself behind the gun control measures, is expected to pull the bill
from the Senate floor and move on to an Internet sales tax measure, then an
overhaul of immigration
policy, which has better prospects.
More than 50 senators —
including a few Republicans, but lacking a handful of Democrats from more
conservative states — had signaled their support for the gun bill, not enough
to reach the 60-vote threshold to overcome a filibuster.
Democratic leadership aides
said the effort could be revived if a public groundswell demanded it. “The
world is watching the United States Senate, and we will be held accountable,”
said Senator Richard Blumenthal, Democrat of Connecticut, who helped lead the
gun control effort.
But with the families of Sandy Hook students in the Senate gallery and a flurry
of gun rights phone calls flooding Senate offices, it was hard to imagine how
much more emotion could be brought to bear. Aides to senators supporting the
bill said that only outside circumstances, like another mass shooting, might
cause those who voted “no” to reconsider their positions.
“It’s almost like you can see
the finish line, but you just can’t get there,” said Andrew Goddard, whose
son, Colin, was hurt but survived the shooting at Virginia Tech. “It’s more
annoying to be able to see it and not get to it.”
Mr. Obama — who avoided the
gun issue in his first term and focused on proposals he thought had a better
chance of passing, only to seize on expansive measures after the Newtown
shootings — made last-ditch appeals to senators, including Dean Heller,
Republican of Nevada, and Kelly Ayotte, Republican of New Hampshire. Both
rejected his entreaties.
Standing in the Rose Garden
next to former Representative Gabrielle Giffords and other victims of gun
violence, Mr. Obama flashed anger as he said that the gun rights lobby had
“willfully lied” about the legislation, and that Republicans and Democrats
had “caved to the pressure.”
“But,” he added, “this effort
is not over.”
For now, the gun rights lobby
has proved more persuasive.
The National Rifle
Association mobilized members to blanket the Senate with phone calls, e-mails
and letters. The group also spent $500,000 on Wednesday alone, on an
advertising campaign criticizing “Obama’s gun ban” and using Mayor Michael R.
Bloomberg, a deep-pocketed gun control advocate, as a foil. “Tell your
senator to listen to America’s
police instead of listening to Obama and Bloomberg,” the ad said.
The action on Wednesday was
initially supposed to be only the first series of votes in a debate to take
days if not weeks. But as the measures’ chances faded this week, Senate
leaders decided to rush the process, reaching a bipartisan agreement to hold
nine votes in succession, each with a 60-vote threshold for passage.
New York Times
|
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét