Surrogacy law could fail
intended benefactors
The strict conditions laid out for
surrrogacy in the law recently approved by the National Assembly opens a very
narrow door for women incapable of child-bearing.
After much discussion and debate,
the National Assembly finally agreed to legalise surrogacy on humanitarian
grounds. What is your opinion on this development?
Nguyen Huy Quang, Head of the Legal
Department of the Ministry of Health
It is true that opinions were quite
different on this issue. There were deputies who felt that the law should
allow surrogacy, while others warned that such a move would have many legal
and social consequences.
The NA passed the law on humanitarian grounds. As a
person who works in the legal field under the Ministry of Health, I think the
move affirms a basic human right: the right to have children.
Besides,
Nguyen Si Dung, Vice Chairman of the
National Assembly Office
I think the humanitarian aspect has won this debate.
However, it's only a modest victory. Although the door has been opened, it
has opened narrowly. Only relatives are allowed to be surrogate mothers; you
can't ask anyone else to do that for you. A mother can't be the surrogate
mother for her daughter, and vice versa. Besides, there are a lot of
conditions and requirements that you have to meet, or proof you have to
produce, to be able to carry out the surrogacy legally.
Even in many developed countries,
surrogacy on humanitarian grounds is still something that is not legalised.
Will it be feasible to enforce the law in
Huy Quang: The amended Law on Marriage and Family
contains very detailed regulations about surrogacy for humanitarian purposes.
I think the feasibility is high and we can mostly prevent surrogacy for
commercial purposes.
Si Dung: With such strict requirements and a narrow
path, I don't think law enforcement would be a big problem. However, in
reality, in
The law was passed based on a majority vote, which means
there are still many NA deputies who disagree with the choice to legalise
surrogacy.
Actually, we should keep in mind that reality always
changes faster than the law. Surrogacy is something that has happened
already, and is still going on. The fact that the amended Law on Marriage and
Family allows surrogacy for humanitarian purposes does not mean that such
activities are encouraged. In fact, the law has considerably narrowed down
the eligibility of such activities.
Anonymous 1 (a woman incapable of child
bearing, who does not want to be named)
Lawmakers should keep in mind that
when couples come to the decision of surrogacy, they must have experienced
many desperate situations. Having children is the most wonderful thing of
all, and I know there are many couples in the country who have not had this
great joy.
All we want, when we have decided that we will ask
someone to be the surrogate mother, is that we are able to hold a baby in our
hands. That wish, that desire is so strong that we, to be honest, don't care
what the law allows and what it doesn't. Yes it's true that in some cases,
asking a relative to be surrogate mother is feasible, but for many couples
that might not be the case. So does that mean those couples have to follow
the law and kill their wish of being real parents? As Vietnamese people, we
always want a baby born from our own flesh and bones, so let's not talk about
adopting a child who is not our blood.
Anonymous2 (another woman incapable
of child bearing)
We are totally disappointed with the new law.
We are a group of unlucky women who are not capable of
bearing children. We want to look for good women who are in financial
difficulties, who need some money and are willing to be surrogate mothers for
us. It's a win-win solution – we desire babies very much, they can solve their
financial problems.
In my case, it's been very difficult to find someone
who is suitable to be a surrogate mother for our babies. If I haven't been
able to find out one so easily when we have such a large population in this
country, I don't think it will be easier looking among the much smaller pool
of my relatives.
Moreover, we want the baby to belong only to us. But if
we ask someone who is our relative to do so, we would feel like we owe them
for the rest of our lives, and what the law can't regulate is the feeling
between the surrogate mother and the baby. Although the law says the baby
would legally be the child of the intended couples who gave their sperms and
eggs, all those who have had babies naturally know how the string develops
between the mother and the babies during the pregnancy. Thus, we want some
stranger to do it for us, so that no further relationship need be maintained
once we receive our babies.
VNS/VNN
|
Chủ Nhật, 6 tháng 7, 2014
Đăng ký:
Đăng Nhận xét (Atom)
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét