|
Auditors
tell Sabeco to pay up
HA NOI - State
Audit officials said an investigation into Sai Gon Beer Alcohol Beverage
Joint Stock Corporation (Sabeco) reveal-ed gaps in special con-sumption tax
policies.
Officials said
the watchdog asked for an additional VND408 billion (US$22.02 million) in
taxes in 2013.
Truong Thi Viet
Huong, director of Regional State Audit Office 4 in HCM City, said that a
proposal to amend the law on excise tax has been sent to the Ministry of
Finance for consideration.
She confirmed at
the conference last week that the case of Sabeco, was not a transfer pricing
case.
Recently, after
auditing the company, the State Audit proposed that Sabeco pay an additional
VND408 billion ($22.02 million) in special consumption tax for 2013, which
caused a controversy.
Sabeco, in
response to the proposal, said that the company complied with regulations and
instructions on filing and paying excise taxes imposed by the General
Department of Taxation and the Ministry of Finance.
The company also
called for the establishment of detailed instructions for tax filings, adding
that it did not know what types of documents to use for calculating excise
taxes.
Sabeco
distributed its beer products through several intermediaries. First, Sabeco
sold its beer to a subsidiary, Sabeco Trading Joint Stock Company, in which
it holds a stake of 90 per cent. Then, the subsidiary sold beer products to
regional trading companies, before selling to dealers and consumers.
Sabeco's excise
tax filing was based on the selling prices of Sabeco Trading Joint Stock
Company, while the State Audit said that the excise tax should be calculated
based on the selling prices of regional trading companies.
Further, the
audit said that regional trading companies were not independent of Sabeco, as
Sabeco still held stakes at these companies, and the prices for tax
calculations must be the prices of regional trading companies.
According to the
current law, the special consumption tax was calculated based upon the end
selling prices of producers.
The difference in
defining end selling prices for tax calculations led to the proposal to
collect additional taxes, indicating a hole in tax policies.
Currently, there
are no specific documents regulating special consumption tax calculations for
distribution systems like Sabeco.
Nguyen Thi Cuc
from the Viet Nam Tax Constancy Association said it was difficult to
determine prices for special consumption tax in such cases.
Still, despite
regulation gaps, Deputy Chief Auditor Cao Tan Khong, speaking at the
conference, said Sabeco must follow the State Audit's proposal of paying
additional tax. — VNS
|
Thứ Hai, 13 tháng 7, 2015
Đăng ký:
Đăng Nhận xét (Atom)
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét