Taking the muzzle off the gun debate
Aaron
Alexis, who the FBI believe to be responsible for the shootings at the
Washington Navy Yard in the Southeast area of Washington, DC, is shown in
this Fort Worth Police Department handout photo released on September 16,
2013. Reuters
When a mass shooting would happen in the
Then critics would respond by accusing those people of
exploiting a tragedy for political gain, to promote a political agenda
(specifically: stricter gun control laws).
Critics argued that there should be a moratorium in the
immediate aftermath of a mass shooting, when no one would discuss politics
but only mourn the victims. Hence the gag rule.
All that seemed to change on Monday, when suspect Aaron Alexis
opened fire on a military facility in Washington, D.C., killing a dozen
people and wounding eight others, at least.
Senator Dianne Feinstein, a top Democrat from
She also said the killings at Navy Yard just add “to the
litany of massacres that occur when a deranged person or grievance killer is
able to obtain multiple weapons.”
The Second Amendment, which guarantees gun ownership rights,
usually pits Republicans against Democrats. But David Frum, a former
speechwriter for Republican President George W. Bush, responded to the Monday
massacre in a decidedly un-conservative manner. He sent a series of tweets to
his nearly 94,000 followers describing rules to follow in the wake of a
shooting spree.
“Rule 1: It is ‘ghoulish’ to suggest in any way that the easy
availability of guns might in any way enable gun slaughter,” Frum wrote on
Twitter.
In past tragedies, this rule might have been followed. But in
this case, Frum is being very sarcastic to point out how the gun lobby has
scared people into believing it is insensitive of them to debate gun control.
And perhaps some people do have reason to be scared. Just this
month, two state senators in
Recalls of politicians are extremely rare, but they happened
in
There have been other such shootings in recent years, such as
the one killing 20 children at Sandy Hook Elementary in 2012, or another
nearly killing then-Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords in
The incidents highlight the
In a follow-up Twitter post, Frum positioned the
“Rule 5: Gun ownership is essential to freedom, as in
Frum was referring to gun owners’ belief that they must
protect themselves with firearms, even though other countries do fine without
their citizens possessing guns.
Mass shootings don’t seem to deter gun owners, or the powerful
National Rifle Association that is supposed to represent them. Instead, they
focus on other potential causes -- such as violent video games and mental
health problems -- that could motivate gunmen like Aaron Alexis. Gun owners
don’t want to talk about guns causing gun violence, and they don’t want
others talking about this either. But on Monday, the conversation started
again anyway.
ANNIE HOANG, Tuoitrenews
|
Thứ Ba, 17 tháng 9, 2013
Đăng ký:
Đăng Nhận xét (Atom)
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét