The 2,290-m
Plans
put forward by the Ministry of Transport for the rebuild/repair of
Hanoi is changing fast and new infrastructure is needed to deal with the city’s rapid growth but when it comes to a heritage, such as Long Bien Bridge, so treasured by many, how does Hanoi find the balance? The public is looking to authorised agencies and the authorities for the solution which harmonises urban development with preservation. Long Bien, the first bridge built to span the Hong (Red) River, was opened to traffic in 1902, becoming the largest construction in The bridge was designed by French engineers but the sweat of more than 3,000 Vietnamese workers over three years built the gigantic steel structure that undulates like a giant dragon across the river. Over the past 100 years, the bridge has welcomed generations of Hanoians back to the city. Many people say that In February 1947, During the American war, bombs fell upon the bridge 14 times, damaging seven spans and four large pillars. In protection, two 11.5m air defense artillery batteries were set up on the Today, with other bridges crossing the Red River such as Thang Long, Chuong Duong, Vinh Tuy and Thanh Tri, Long Bien is no longer the main urban transport route across the river but for Hanoians and the millions who love the city, the capital is not However, the question is that any solution would bring the balance. Time has worn In 2005, the Ministry of Transport (MoT) approved a project to upgrade the Yen Vien – Ngoc Hoi urban railway route, linking areas in the north and the south of According to the Transport Engineering Design Company, the project’s consultant design agency, the position which meets MoT also proposed two major plans to tackle the rising transport demand, of which Long Bien is part of the story, and both received a huge amount of concern from the public and experts. The first plan is to build a new bridge exactly where the old one stands, keeping the central part with the railway track intact, while removing nine spans of the bridge, which would be preserved and displayed for tourism. The second is to construct a new bridge, with a similar design to the original, and to keep the old one for preservation. Many people strongly oppose both plans, claiming that the bridge should “live” with According to Tran Trong Hanh, Vice President of the National Council of the Vietnamese Architects’ Association, He stressed that the consultancy agency should be made up of experts in traffic but also in arts and heritage so they can formulate a design which balances the two needs. Any proposal should highlight the artistic and cultural value of the bridge and be made public so other experts and the whole community can have a say, he added. From the viewpoint of cultural researcher Phan Cam Thuong, When it comes to road transport, MoT and the city administration need to listen to the opinions of the public, experts and scientists so as to select the best solution for the upgrade of Long Bien Bridge under the motto ‘harmonising preservation and development’ as stated by head of Office of the Hanoi Municipal People’s Committee Nguyen Thinh Thanh.-VNA |
Thứ Sáu, 28 tháng 2, 2014
Đăng ký:
Đăng Nhận xét (Atom)
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét